Consecutive-word matching
Identifies matching word sequences in the target manuscript and the comparison documents you uploaded. Longer phrases are prioritised and counted once.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY STUDIO / 01
Original ideas deserve
a clear view.
Compare manuscripts with your own reference documents. Find matching language, review the evidence, and create a shareable similarity report — without uploading your research to a plagiarism server.
THE WORKSPACE
STEP 01 — UPLOAD & CONFIGUREStart a similarity review
Your documents
0 / 10
Drop documents here, or browse
Choose one manuscript and at least one comparison source.
PDF (text-based), DOCX, TXT · up to 12 MB each · 10 files maxi
The first file becomes the manuscript. Additional files become comparison sources. You can change these selections.
Review settings
LOCAL ENGINE8 words
More sensitiveMore selective
Documents are processed on this device. Only brief result summaries can be kept in your browser history.
Add two or more documents to begin.
THE FINDINGS
STEP 02 — REVIEW & REPORTSimilarity analysis
MATCHED WORD COVERAGE
0%
Compared only with your selected filesMATCHED WORDS0Counted once per target word
MATCHING PASSAGES0Exact + possible close wording
SOURCES CHECKED0From your uploaded documents
i
Interpretation matters: A similarity percentage is not a plagiarism verdict. Legitimate citations, shared terminology and standard phrases may match. The score reflects only the selected documents, never the entire web or publisher databases.
Passages requiring review
Highlighted manuscript
Gold = exact match · Blue = possible close wordingChapter-level coverage
Detected from chapter headings where availableComparison sources
PERSONAL WORKSPACE
Your recent reviews
Only report summaries are stored on this browser. Full manuscript text and files are never added to local history.
0 saved reviews
METHODOLOGY & LIMITS
Know what the score means.
BRIHANTRA Originality v1.0 is a transparent, local document-to-document similarity review tool — not an internet crawler or plagiarism adjudicator.
Conservative close matching
Compares word overlap and three-word patterns to flag passages with minor wording changes. It cannot reliably identify conceptual copying or substantial paraphrasing.
Document-based score
Matched, eligible target words ÷ all eligible target words. Reference-list and quotation exclusions alter the denominator. This is not a Turnitin or iThenticate equivalent.
Privacy and supported files
Text is processed in your browser, without transmitting manuscripts to our server. Text-based PDFs need a PDF parsing library loaded online; scanned PDFs with no text layer require OCR and are not supported.
Questions researchers ask
Does it compare against Google or journal archives?
No. Only the local sources you select. A future licensed API could provide wider coverage.
Can it detect AI-generated writing?
No. AI text detection is not included in this release, and such estimates can be unreliable.
Why might a PDF appear empty?
Some PDFs are scanned page images with no selectable text. Use an OCR tool to create a searchable PDF or convert its text into DOCX/TXT before uploading.
Are the results accepted by universities?
No institutional acceptance or equivalence to official similarity-check platforms is claimed. Use this for preliminary self-review; follow your institution’s policies for official submissions.